Payment service fees deserve a regular review in an Albany tourism or hospitality business, especially when bookings, deposits and counter sales pass through different systems. A monthly total alone does not show whether costs changed because of the contract, the mix of transactions or additional work for staff. These questions help turn provider reports into decisions you can explain.

What should the monthly review actually cover?

Start with the services the business uses: a restaurant terminal, accommodation booking payments, online deposits or payment links for an activity. List each provider, account and reporting period. Include subscriptions, equipment charges and separately invoiced services alongside transaction fees. Keep customer sales, provider charges and money transferred to the bank as distinct figures.

Use the same reporting boundary each month. If a booking platform reports by booking date while a payment processor reports by transaction date, label the difference. Otherwise an apparent fee increase may simply reflect transactions appearing in different periods. Note whether the report includes every location and device used by the business.

Which records help explain the charges?

Collect the detailed fee report, relevant invoices, transaction records and bank transfers. For example, Square’s Australian reporting guidance explains how its fee reports show transaction charges and how dashboard detail differs from an app summary. This illustrates why a headline sales screen may be insufficient; another provider can organise its reports differently.

Retain the original export and record the filters used. A saved spreadsheet with no date range or account name is difficult to check later. Give the reviewer access appropriate to their role, rather than distributing the main account password. Ask the bookkeeper how charges should be classified; downloading a tax report does not itself establish the business’s tax treatment.

Does a higher fee total mean the service became more expensive?

Not necessarily. Compare transaction counts, payment amounts and the services used before drawing that conclusion. A busier month, more online payments or a different mix of booking channels can change the total. Identify any published or notified contract change separately from changes in customer activity.

A simple internal measure is total identified processing charges divided by the corresponding processed sales amount. State what is included in both figures. This is a comparison aid, not a contractual fee rate or a complete measure of profitability. Do not compare one provider’s all-inclusive figure with another’s transaction charges alone.

  • Which charges are fixed even when sales are quiet?
  • Which depend on transaction volume, channel or payment type?
  • Which relate to an additional service that staff actually use?
  • Which cannot yet be matched to the agreement or supporting record?

How should refunds and unusual items be handled?

Keep an exception list for refunds, disputed transactions, adjustments and unexplained charges. Record the transaction reference, amount, date and the question to resolve. Check the provider’s actual terms and transaction status before assuming a refunded sale also reverses every associated fee.

For an accommodation business, distinguish a booking cancellation from the payment action taken afterwards. For a café, distinguish a voided order from a completed card transaction. These are practical review categories, not conclusions about what a customer is legally owed. Escalate uncertain customer remedies or contract questions to an appropriately qualified adviser.

Assign each exception an owner and a next check date. A support ticket marked closed is not enough if the bank record or customer record remains unexplained. Retain the provider’s response with the original question, so next month’s reviewer can see what was resolved and what remains outstanding.

Can the business simply pass processing fees to customers?

The current rules must be checked separately from merchant costs. The ACCC’s card surcharge guidance states that from 1 October 2026 businesses cannot add surcharges for Visa, Mastercard, American Express or eftpos credit, debit or prepaid card payments. A provider charging the business a processing fee does not make a separate customer card surcharge permissible.

The guidance distinguishes card surcharges from hospitality weekend and public holiday surcharges. Different price display obligations still matter. Do not rename a card payment surcharge as a service fee to avoid the rules. Review customer-facing prices and seek advice about uncertain arrangements rather than copying an old terminal setting.

What decision should come out of the review?

Choose a limited action supported by the records: query an unexplained charge, remove an unused optional service, request a like-for-like quote or improve the way staff record refunds. Include training, equipment, integration and exit work before deciding that switching providers will save money.

For Albany operators with changing visitor demand, compare the month with its actual operating pattern rather than an assumed tourism boom. Keep one page showing costs, volume, unresolved exceptions and agreed actions. Next month, check whether those actions changed the problem they were meant to address. That makes the review useful even when keeping the existing provider is the best-supported decision.

Related Posts